To meet the precise the requirements of the customers under the rapid changes in society, environment, and technology.  In order to fulfill the new globalized standards and to deliver intuitively robust product sometimes the traditional project management methods revolve around time, cost, and quality might not be enough. No methodology offers the 100% solution so you can choose to pick and ignore the advantages and disadvantages of traditional project management over the benefits of agile methodology best suiting to your project.

A better strategy is to design a project management strategy to fit the methodology (or blend of methodologies) to your company. When there are types of project management methodologies in the business, we have to be conscious of the ones, which would do the job best for certain kinds of projects. Selecting the most appropriate project management methodology might be a tricky undertaking. There are various project management methodologies to benefit distinctive projects.

The Project management methodologies

Project management methodologies are referred to the application knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to a broad range of actions or activities to achieve the project objectives. Traditional project management is one of the main project management methods.

Traditional methodologies

The traditional project management methodology is the complete methodology for ongoing projects in a sequential cycle: initiations, planning, executing, monitoring, controlling and closing. It works best for the projects which can be completed in one sequence. It completes the successful delivery of the project in time and low budget.

Advantages of traditional project management methodology

1.    Cost Effective

Since the projects are easier to complete under traditional project management. That’s is why they likely take less time in completion and in meeting the timeline successfully. There are very few chances of facing bugs, errors or complex problems during the planning, designing, testing and the final execution of the project.

The companies happily go for the traditional methodology for smaller and sequential projects. They take less time, fewer developers and fewer resources to complete.

It is also less costly because the companies don’t need to use heavy technology and machinery to complete such projects.

2.    Suitable for Remote Projects

Communication and different geographical position becomes a major hurdle for larger and complex projects. Traditional projects are smaller and easier ones are highly applicable for remote projects. As such projects can be developed by a smaller team and don’t require much communication to solve the hurdles.

3.    It’s Sequential

It has sequential patterns which make it easy to follow the traditional methodology. The sequential projects don’t need much alteration during the development. If you stick to the developing plan, there are likely the best chances to finish your task within the time schedule and all other criteria. The sequence also makes management and development easier.

Traditional model suits best for the smaller projects where requirements are clear and understandable. Every step in the traditional method has a start and end point hence it’s flexible to share progress with stakeholders and customers. The focused preplanning on requirements and design before writing a code reduces the risk of errors and delay.

The sequential procedure requires proper documentation for every phase which results in an enhanced understanding of the logic behind the code and evaluation. This sequence creates proper trails for the stakeholder to have an insight into a specific phase.

4.    Quick Time Around

A standard problem facing many firms, no matter where they’re in the business lifecycle, is they get stuck in the trenches of daily operations, at the expense of conducting business growth activities. It wastes resources, money and time. Traditional methodology projects don’t require much changing as they follow a sequence. That’s is why they are delivered on time.

5.    Optimization of Customer’s Satisfaction

The traditional projects are not too complex to meet the requirements of the client. Every project management methodology highly prioritizes the happiness of the clients. The entire development process occurs under the keen view of the client’s requirements. The client is being aware of each process, confidential about feedback, prioritized for each demand.

In the event the customer is clear regarding the needs of the software that will be developed, the traditional model is the very best approach to follow because it follows a sequential strategy and requirements are made clear in the very first phase.

6.    Responsible for the Quality Deliverable

Every software development methodology has the goal to deliver quality development to create a robust product, efficiently meeting to market’s demands. It is more foolish than a fancy assumption to achieve 100% results. The realistic approach and refined precision can be attained through dedicated competency, collaboration, coordination, and management.

7.    No Training is required

The traditional project management is a flexible one to go with as it needs no prior knowledge and training to begin the projects. The traditional methodology is also a rigid model; the specific deliverable and reviews make it easy to manage and develop.

8.    Secured

No project is ever without risks, but it’s the nature and intricacy of the project that is most likely to learn the effect of the risks on the entire success of the undertaking. Bigger projects will call for additional heights of consultation to assess the extra company and technical requirements.

Traditional project management ensures privacy and security. It supports a robust security mechanism during the end to end execution of the program.

9.    Flexible Management

Controlling a project is rather one of the toughest things in project administration. There’s a demand for the entire team to have a good comprehension of their own development and management practice. Management change ought to be well structured so as to achieve goals and missions.

In the present dynamic business environment, there’s a strong demand for those organizations to become globally competitive. Because management failures can make development worse and uncontrollable.
Traditional projects require fewer teams and less complex management to handle project development.

10. Easy to Change

The project starts with a simplistic design and afterward is shaped by short development cycles that permit the general project design to change when the need comes up.

11. Efficiency

The best project management strategy and the successful execution of the project develops a good relationship with the clients for future projects. It also has a positive impact on the team in gaining experience and specialized to handle complex and technical activities.

It’s especially suited to projects developed in complex environments where there’s a need to receive results quickly.

Disadvantages of Traditional Project Management

1)    It is Slow

It is going to be a slow development if your client isn’t clear about the requirements. Since the changes are difficult in the sequential methodology of traditional project management. The changes can break the sequence and the next development step will be trodden upon until the previous step isn’t completed.

2)    No Customer Focal Point

There isn’t much space for the customer’s opinion in every development process. The clients are not involved or being open to the entire development process until the product is ready. If it is not according to client’s requirements then it’s going to be a time-wasting phenomenon. The stage of finalizing product is too late to check the marketing accountability of the product as well.

Making the customer happy is the topmost priority of today’s world. Because it’s their happiness which is going to determine your actual position application development company in the market.

3)    The absence of the Central Authority

There are individual subcontractors controlling the ropes of development. There isn’t any singular dynamic teamwork and leadership as a central authority.

4)    Time Management

The time mismanagement issue can arise in traditional methodology due to lack of mutual teamwork, unity, and mutual development.

5)    Lack of Intuitiveness

There isn’t much space for new ideas to employ in traditional methodology. The sequential method doesn’t have room for continuous evolution. You cannot do much but just to follow the sequence.

6)    Lack of Coordination

The subcontractors are involved as individuals, not as a singular dynamic team. There is no attempt is made to have unity, mutual teamwork, and commitment to the development. The lack of coordination delays the development and can cause some serious issues.

7)    Local Optimization  

All individual subcontractors only care about their own efforts and talent. If something goes wrong, there isn’t mutual teamwork to defend and tackle the problem.

No teamwork, no dream work in traditional project management.

8)    No Easy Change

Once an application is on the testing stage, it is very likely impossible, time taking and expensive to go back and fix it according to the requirements. Sometimes you need to start again to implement any changes.

9)    Risk Involving and challenging development

Sometimes the customers and stakeholder are not sure about their requirements in the start, and waterfall software development cannot begin without gathering all relevant details and requirements.  That’s is why the traditional approach does not offer much space for customer’s feedback and the customized final product. It is also a not viable model for complex, big and object-oriented project development.

Agile Methodology Vs the Traditional Approach

The agile isn’t a single tool but instead an approach inspired by the limitations of conventional application development project management practices. Agile acts as a remedy to the shortcomings of the waterfall approach. More specifically, agile is a superior methodology for building software under states of uncertainty.

Agile is very well suited to projects where there’s a good deal of uncertainty for what kind of thing you’re building, who will want it, how much they may want to pay for it, and the way they might like it to look and work. Considered one of its best strengths, agile allows the freedom to produce changes as crucial.

Agile software development supplies a business the advantages of greater turnaround time, greater customizability, and on-demand deployment. The longer the project continues, the greater the dangers of the initial planning becoming out of date.

Teamwork in Traditional Project Management vs Agile Methodology

Application developers use to reside in a world of their very own. Unlike traditional design, the developer has to know the interface and the code should not disturb the appearance and feel of the website or application. To accomplish this, the company developer should have insight into an array of business-related fields, and have access to key information that could allow new parallels to be drawn.

a)    Unity Vs Lack of Unity

The unified teamwork with the customer, team leads, project managers and developers to pay continuous attention to technical excellence and design’s agility.  While the lack of mutual teamwork in traditional approach makes it lacking intuitiveness and timely delivery.

b)    Communication Vs Silence

The agile software development supports the most efficient method of delivering information to and within a development team is to have good communication. While the individual subcontractors are following the traditional methodology’s sequence doesn’t have much to talk.

c)     Mutual teamwork Vs No Teamwork

Agile project management develops a healthy environment for the team by giving them mutual support and freedom with their work.  The traditional approach’s subcontractors are only passionate about their own work. They don’t rely upon others help to meet the deadlines. Agile methodology is about teamwork while traditional methodology is about individual profitability.

d)    Sustainability

Agile software development and traditional approach ensure sustainable development. The sponsors and the developers are able to maintain a smooth pace towards the development and execution of the project.

Project management in traditional methodology vs Agile Approach

To manage the changes is among the most difficult tasks any business can embark on. Agile management isn’t just for managers. The continued management is a team event instead of solely dependent upon a couple of individuals. Furthermore, project management demands a more powerful strategy orientation. The project manager is a professional in the area of project administration.

There’s no one-size-fits-all approach in regards to agile frameworks. Multiple efficient project management frameworks and methodologies are introduced through the years to make sure effective team management and collaboration at work. There isn’t a methodology that you may stringently adopt that will indicate all your projects become delivered effortlessly.

The loss of control of managing capabilities is one of the crucial drawbacks of agile software development. As it can heavily impact on production, and marketing reputation. Agile’s larger teams are trickier and difficult to manage.

Time Zone Difference in Agile Development and Traditional Approach

Agile methodology largely depends on the mutual efforts of the agile team. The different geographical positions can delay the error removal process due to different time schedules. Interaction from remote places is hard because you never see each other’s actions, to share ideas on friendly bases. The telecommunication services such as video conferencing, chat and online whiteboards etc. can be pricey and may not be as effective.

Implementation of Agile Development Vs Traditional Project Management

Agile software development doesn’t implement fully in a night or a day. Agile does not work in a hierarchy-driven organizational setup. Its wide range of software development methodology which requires lots of practice, experience, and diligence to successfully implement it.

The traditional approach follows the sequence doesn’t require much experience and patience to implement the methodology successfully.

Software development life cycle agile vs traditional approaches

The agile methodology follows an incremental strategy, rather than a sequential design procedure,

Agile methodology adopts a continuous change, intuitiveness, and evolution. The shorter planning cycles developed and continuously tested to the successful implementation of the change. The continuous change computes the backlog and makes the development more refine. However, agile is the best application approach for larger projects but often faces complexities in managing such large programs.

Additionally, in agile scrum projects, it is the most important development member in the agile value-chain and therefore quality improvement measures are thoroughly followed in each sprint to ensure the developed product is completely fault-free. The customer and the developers collaborate to work out the way to adapt to every change as it’s encountered on the undertaking.

Traditional software methodology is simple, easier and follows the common development pattern. It cannot offer much space for evolution and new ideas. The smaller projects are easy to handle under traditional methodology.

Customer’s Care difference between agile and traditional project management

In agile software development, the clients can see the progress of the developing process. Therefore, they can share their own input in order to remove ambiguities about their requirements at every step. Their timely feedback quickens the work speed.

The agile methodology is easy to manage. It allows the agile team to concentrate on quality-oriented development, testing, and collaboration with the help of smaller iterations. The constant weekly meetings review all undergoing process to ensure it according to a customized final product. The continuous testing eliminates errors and offers solutions with the help of mutual efforts of developers and team leads.

In a traditional approach, there isn’t much space to offer to their clients for their suggestions at every development step.

Closing Thought

Above all, selecting the incorrect methodology may also hamper your effective management of the undertaking. It could also interfere with the delivery of a number of the project’s goals and objectives.

In the current day market, it’s important for companies to move forward with speed and agility. Meanwhile, the company can frustrate that IT never appears to understand the things that they want and complains when they need to produce changes just before the project is delivered. Most companies aren’t likely to acquire multi-million dollar government bailouts.

An application development business will take on such a challenge and through a set of iterations, it will deliver an application that meets each of the customer and legislative requirements. The large management consulting firms provide a diverse set of services frequently international in scope.